Monday, December 31, 2012

mecha

Mecha

1.
My wife called me over to proofread one of her papers for modern poetry class. “Oh, Wallace Stevens, I like Wallace Stevens,” I said brightly. “I don’t need to hear it, just find the typos,” she said. “What’s this in the 13th line: spended? That’s not right.” But it was.

Now, I had read this poem before. In fact, I’d read the Complete Works early on in college. I was in the philosophy professor’s office standing in front of a tall stodge-full bookcase. Seeking a royal shortcut or something, some clue, I asked what the best book out of all of these was. I probably would’ve gotten around to it in time anyway, but the upshot was I read my checked-out library copy cover to cover like a novel.

Anyone will tell you that’s not how you do Stevens. Like hell would I remember ever reading this ridiculous leprechauny little word. This word which is not in the English language. I grew intrigued. (Once I fasten on a question I don’t let up.) I looked in concordances of Shakespeare, Milton, and Chaucer: no dice. Frustrated, I dug deep into the OED. And so I gradually concluded I could almost guess what he was up to, in this particular line.

I ended up writing a paper for an important academic journal, even though my wife warned me that a single word in a poem was “a trifle slender” for a topic. See, if he wasn’t quoting some other old writer (though I couldn’t rule that out; I found nothing in any other Stevens criticism that even noticed it) and archaïcizing, since no one had used that spelling for 400 years, then the obvious thing was that he had a joke in there, and it happened to be the joke of a form which looked like a verb but wasn’t. What if it was the noun “spend” (meaning, here, ‘debt’) with the rare (but still preserved in certain phrases, e.g. in the song “America the Beautiful”: “Above the fruitèd plain”—having an abundance of fruit) nonverbal -ed ending, and he meant that the ghosts’ hearts were not just exhausted but way beyond that, full of a voracious emptiness, full of debts?

They rejected my essay. I did, however, start receiving fund appeals by email. The Large Red Man, as far as I know, is still Reading.

2.
I love to quote Hugh Kenner: “…nobody has yet imagined a plausible Wallace Stevens.” I used to think I had.

We were in a dusty old New Orleans bookstore (this was pre-Katrina, needless to say), and what did I find? A vintage copy of Harmonium. Good price (it was full of pencil’d annotations: “willow= symbol of sorrow, desolation or [illegible]”). And so, home with it we sped. I won’t tell you what other goodies I found there (who else would rejoice at finding not one but four Van Vechten novels?) but it quickly became part of my most cherished shelf, my truebrary.

He was H. R. Pufnstuf, that’s who he was. Just turn on any blacklight.

The way my mind works, I line up: H. R. Haldeman of Watergate notoriety, the local orange-dwarf star HR 8832, H. R. Giger (don’t say “Geiger”!), the royal monogram HRH, oh, maybe Old Norse words that start with Hr- like hráfn ‘raven’…you get the idea. This is an explanation.

What boggles people’s minds is they think a poet has to live hand to mouth like a Murger hero and spit blood from his eyes like a horntoad. If he wears a suit to work every day it has to be a stunt. Sure he went to Florida every year just so he could sit out on a verandah and nurse watery juleps.

“Forms, flames, and the flakes of flames.”

Anyone can write about snow in Connecticut. It takes real genius to have a “mind of snow” in Key West.

3. I spent five years on the ninth floor of a glass office tower and rode the bus to work. I learned to loop a tie just right, and keep nettlesome thoughts to myself. These were the “mecha” years—lodged willy-nilly inside a Giant Robot. There were things required of me. Imagination lay elsewhere and otherwise.

“And a large dwarf picked and picked up nothing.” –Laura Riding

Hundreds of foreclosures crossed my desk every day. And this was just one of many desks in the mortgage department. These were truly the cryptic record of dreams being ruthlessly destroyed, lives shattered, entire families thrown into the streets. Would it matter if I withheld my rubber stamp’s approval? Would the flicker of the fluorescents skip one hemidemisemiquaver?

I saw Stevens in his fuzzy gray suit, eyes hooded, mind furiously at work upon some blank verse paragraph that wouldn’t come out right. There was a truce between Giant Robots.

It was only humans they exterminated.

4.
Sometimes Facebook is like lifting great rocks and finding the grisly early larval form of yourself. I found out through a mutual electronic connection that (let’s call him:) Yorick had died, just recently in fact. I was aghast: his jetblack mane and beard had turned ghost white. (He was still trying to legalize pot...) Well, it’s been quite a few turns around the sun I admit, and humans today are just fixing to reach the asteroid formerly known as Planet Pluto with an unmanned probe, but once upon a time I made him concede he was now “the second-best chess player in the Yippies.”

I for one find nothing as scathingly hopeful as a new recrudescence among youngfolk of the idealistic though totally unfounded belief that they can change the world. I would be out there with a sleeping bag on the red-eyed barricades. I still want to bring down Babylon. “Horrors and falsities and wrongs...” Whatever.

We were building a man-high papiermâché head of the current incumbent, a peanut farmer who’d done none of us any real harm. We were going to mount it in a parade down Fifth Avenue. Gradually the eagerness of the volunteers tapered off, till it was only me and Yorick’s willowy lover left still at work. You have to be another Aspergian to appreciate the category of “someone I could imagine might have been my girlfriend” and to be truthful, we only talked a few times. (I expect for part of that night I was describing the desired consistency of the paste.) What appealed to me was that she was fierce, and in fact it was proverbial that the female Yippies were bolder and far more uncompromising than the males. She was also pregnant.

It set me to musing, it did, this unborn child of two arch-anarchist braves. Would it ever see a world where America’d quit the idle habit of dropping bombs on strangers by the kiloton, would there ever be a flower in the Giant Robot’s hand?

“Be the voice of night and Florida in my ear.”

One line can be a complete poem (--Ben Jonson?); one word can be worth explicating. In my case it was on Facebook when I read, under her personal profile, the word “grandma”.

5.
What’s inside a Giant Robot? Maybe only leprechauns. The re-invention of vampires led to that of werewolves, witches, now it’s zombies’ turn to shuffle onstage and into the cultural spotlight. I say the leprechaun’s day is at hand. You heard it here first. To my co-worker at lunch I was expatiating on the subject of cars. “There ought to be a race track that wasn’t used for races, just for people who had a car they wanted to drive fast in, without being bothered by other cars or the heat. I want an evil old Ferrari from the Sixties. I figure I’d start out, oh, a hundred laps at 50, 60, I’d work my way up to 180 but I’d get there.” He pointed out that such a car was probably the costliest thing on four wheels this planet could offer. “Yeah, and you’d still crash that motherfucker.”

Well hey, that’s the next best thing to a Viking Funeral.

CODA
Taylor and the girl are riding a horse along the shore. From off-camera the horns of a colossal crown slowly appear. The girl doesn’t know why he’s stopped cold, cursing, fallen on his knees in the gelid surf, gripped with an unbearable realization as he stares into the man-high wrecked Giant Robot face of that iconic statue he thought he would never see again.

“As he sat there reading, the giant blue tabulae.”

Come, hungry ghosts.

Monday, November 26, 2012

instar & vertigo

I graduated out of collecting. At first, it was the utterly unique item in antique malls i sought. Then, broken things i found (always with the intention of creating an assemblage-sculpture one day) & carried home. Finally, i came to understand there was nothing i needed to do to them. They were already perfect.

With wabi-sabi eyes i portend a successful downfall. While i might beg more amenities in my ungreen years, i must recognize that erosion, no less than morning aches, is nature's way of hooking us offstage; in short, a weather.

We had our preferences once, our maniacal druthers, & look what it has brought us to. I don't believe in karma but i do acknowledge limits. "May I bow to Necessity/ not her hirelings," writes Merwin. This is not the Age of Assassins so much as the Intermezzo of Nemesis. Later they will look back, with horrified fascination perhaps (is that still a response you have leisure for, my hypothetical grand-childen?)--so much gone to waste, from such splendid beginnings. All--kaputt!

I write these words in smoke on the charnel wind, & glory in the freedom of the pyre. Let the ragpickers stalk, the diggers, bricoleurs through a wonderland of scrap: nothing that is what it was, & everything up for grabs. they will not even know that this language was once called English, & if some of them still believe that humans have walked on the Moon, the bulk of them will scoff.

And what is it to those moonrocks if they never fly back home? My people let me starve to death, not as a particular cruelty, but because they simply couldn't be bothered to think. There are colors that will never be seen again, do you realize that?If i were to describe them for an hour you still could not see them.

Some tasks remain--not so much an inventory (Simone Weil)--though making lists was one of our favorite vices--maybe it's only to acquire the art of lingering. At last. We last. Make it last. The fruit fly darting around me, knows as much. We totter, Little One, we who wanted to live forever. Henceforth we will be foolish anew--but in other ways.

Monday, August 6, 2012

on the two principles

It seems almost too obvious for me to remark upon: the longer i spend in a place (a place, that is, under my sole purview), the more orderly it becomes. Though of an order often uncertain to a casual onlooker, i can invariably give my reason or reasoning for any aspect being made thus. On the other hand, i have observed the opposite in others, to the point where i can imagine some asymptote of total chaos, should their sojourn in the vicinity be prolonged. How is this so?

Convergent, divergent versions of the same process. Where i adjust toward & always replicate, another person fails to put back, or puts back differently. Not that they aren't capable of a reasoned construction. It just isn't where they dwell. It is felt as a dreary necessity ("cleaning"--at overdue intervals), or an imposition. There isn't the pleasure i feel in repose, or peace, or silence. Instead, a pleasure in release, in abandon,--in breaking things.

Other dialectics superimpose upon this one: the desire to stop others from their "fun"--to lock them up, or kill them, if necessary. A bad order, because the good order is unimaginable. If so many of us didn't act like grown children, then the parent-state could just wither, i suppose. Because a true grown-up does what has to be done. Picks up, puts away, plans for the future. You see how much of that has been happening.

If we listened long enough to the music of the world, we might find ourselves able to attune to it. I do not think a good human order will be different from a good order in nature. In fact this is a way to judge our tentative utopias from the get-go: how many of our fellow creatures, do they require us to destroy?

Monday, July 23, 2012

on free will

(image by Fiona Rae)

two somewhat pertinent quotes from my book:

"Refusing to believe in chance is the most subtle, & perhaps the least pernicious, form of denial. But who is there can believe in neither chance nor necessity?"

"My doctrine of Moments of Choosing: humans don't have free will except at long intervals & for brief moments, & they mostly let them go by; but for that time, it is possible to make a more free or less free choice, with ramifying consequences thereafter. Thus it is wisdom to develop sensitivity toward such moments, & to learn what to do with them while they are here."

actually, rather than quibble at all, i can today only marvel at people's readiness to plunge into sides-taking in any discussion whatsoever without defining the key terms: almost as if doing so, would invalidate the heroism of the plunge. (but then, where would philosophy be?)

perhaps they would only discover, that even though these words cannot be defined, we're still unwilling to give them up.

which is something, after all, to know.

on progress

the myth of progress would have this fictive entity "knowledge" growing on an upcurve without restraint or limit.

just like other things that look good on this curve.

i myself regard it like the multiplication of bacteria, as a cautionary tale.

every culture regards itself as the repository of all necessary wisdom, & whatever it lacks gets pushed beyond some useful horizon of don't-care-to-find-out.

instead of people filling their memories with lore of the tribe, useable skills, & integrated perceptions of their immediate environment, nowadays they stock up with media products, imaginary worlds, & cultivated triviality. i doubt if this fits us for any survival outside of this moment in time which will surely end in most of our lifetimes.

we won't even have maps or encyclopedias by then.

Thursday, June 14, 2012

on being correct when others aren't

it used to bother me a lot that schools weren't doing a better job of turning out literate adults, since i believe that to be the best defense a democratic society has against demagoguery, but after seeing the rise of a host of pipsqueak prescriptivists, who base their repetitious punditry not upon any deep acquaintance with the literary tradition, but upon a small set of gotchas they use to express their inordinate contempt for the masses, i have to say: our language is not served by such self-appointed guardians; & even though one of my two jobs is helping students (often ESOL) master mid-twentieth century formal English (--which i say: most of our books are written in), i also know that there existed a form of English before that, & another before that, which were equally good tools of communication for their speakers. so will there be another, when these (high-acid) books are dust.

but like every other public debate, this gets reduced to a comicbook battle between antagonists, each with their half-truth.

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

    on neurodiversity politics

it's good. i think it brings many of the relevant topics into this academic idiom very well.

historically, every pluralist victory has been achieved not because it's the right thing to do but because that belated acceptance promises to put an end to the troublesome minority's clamor for equal rights.

there's not a chance in the world that NTs will actually come to consider themselves other than the custodians of consensus reality; they are newly confirmed by each effortless interaction, & begrudge even handicapped parking places when it means they have to park farther out.

we will be doing good to achieve the status of just another minority, colorful & empowered to have a putative say in how our lives can be minimally accommodated. our point of view in any particular discussion, though, will not prevail except by adopting the rhetorical tools & persuasions that an NT is able to respond to; it's a characteristically aspie mistake to rely upon unadorned logic. that doesn't even work on professional philosophers.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

an exchange from wrong planet

The_Postmaster wrote:
Same here. I started playing chess, and within a year I was playing at the level of people who had been playing for 5 years. And this is only one example, it happens with just about everything that doesn't involve socializing.


that was my experience, though (as much as i love music) i've had to accept the fact that i don't have the talent for making sounds people want to listen to...tuneless, arrhythmic, harsh; i imagine a culture that valued being able to make things as unlike what was made before, as possible. but that's not what music is--or art either--really.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

how


my book of primes
goes into the box
how will i know now

when i meet a new number
if it's happy or sad


Monday, March 19, 2012

feral


i imagine in many other places & times there was not even sanctioned nonconformity, but during my life i have visited several of the sanctioned subcultures (which are generally pretty conformist within their limits, but moreso than the society around) & managed to fit in, while it served my purposes to.

true eccentricity is not easy for most others to even perceive; they don't get past their initial repugnance to discover what it is that made them dislike it. they substitute something they already know about. you're lucky if it's not a projection. better a cliche of harmless silliness than that-which-must-be-destroyed.

i have met numerous individuals of the authentic kind, not always simpatico but often. these believe in following their own forms, something i call "autotelic" to unite it with similar phenomena (the creation of a work of art, for example). even though i know this is not possible for everyone, i can't help thinking the world would be a better place if it were.

endangered--like the rest of the natural world. aspie is somehow feral.


Tuesday, January 24, 2012

i have seen the future


After "bytebeat" & Robot X. & datamoshing*, i can already foresee the development of humanly-pleasing, quasi-random computer-generated media (whether images, music, or words) that satisfy the casual desire for entertainment-distraction, & obviate the commercial need for content-providers. All that will remain will be the creative development & differentiation of branding... Those with a taste for oldmedia will, of course, be able to find it in specialty-niche markets--at a price. Just as a few collect 8-tracks or 78 RPM records; silent movie aficionados (& really, when was it ever easier to find such stuff since the lapse of their heyday?); books of poetry in prior Englishes... But will the internet endure, once downsizing proceeds beyond a certain point? I fear these things will be lost, after that. What "use" are they, to the ones who are coming?

------------------------------------------------------------------
*not to mention Harold Cohen's AARON